Today's hottest deals

Dell XPS 17 9700

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemDell XPS 17 9700  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0P1CHN
Memory56.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230925
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '24 at 19:13
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 184
75% 126 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 437
46% 371 Pts
64-Core 648
40% 648 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Dell(1028 098F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.17% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 8.9
5% 8.4 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 12.2
9% 10.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.17%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PM981a Samsung 512GB
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15303129 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,391
Write 1,411
Mixed 1,082
289% 1,295 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 55.8
182% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 545
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 576
381% 460 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 314%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB
874GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,205
Write 1,316
Mixed 1,189
277% 1,236 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 54.1
180% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 564
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 575
384% 468 MB/s
Poor: 194% Great: 438%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL32G32C16S4B.M16FB1 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 25.3
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 26.1
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 17" 1280 720 SHP14D7
Typical XPS 17 9700 Builds (Compare 1,717 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 17 9700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback