Asrock X370 Gaming X

Performance Results


Gaming 106% UFO	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 100% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	146% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Gaming X (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181217
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 01 '24 at 18:23
Run Duration	211 Seconds
Run User	LVA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	70.2% Very good	Memory 80.7 1-Core 113 2-Core 190 74% 128 Pts	4-Core 321 8-Core 647 57% 484 Pts	64-Core 811 50% 811 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759 18,552 User benchmarks, average bench 143% XFX(1EAE 6705) ≥ 4GB Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.12.1 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	146% Outstanding	Lighting 179 Reflection 178 Parallax 379 146% 246 fps	MRender 326 Gravity 135 Splatting 212 180% 224 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 146% Great: 153%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 790 Write 633 Mixed 559 147% 661 MB/s	4K Read 50.7 4K Write 86.9 4K Mixed 60.3 200% 66 MB/s	DQ Read 851 DQ Write 632 DQ Mixed 731 549% 738 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Samsung 970 EVO 250GB 613 User benchmarks, average bench 300% 195GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1011 525 511 492 479 465 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	232% Outstanding	Read 2,406 Write 1,842 Mixed 1,712 SusWrite 580 364% 1,635 MB/s	4K Read 53.5 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 68.5 222% 74.1 MB/s	DQ Read 884 DQ Write 525 DQ Mixed 754 548% 721 MB/s
Poor: 183% ↑ This bench: 232% Great: 382%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 689GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 167 168 166 167 165 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	94% Outstanding	Read 161 Write 161 Mixed 90.1 SusWrite 166 106% 145 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.2 241% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 94% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB 122,822 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	91.8% Outstanding	MC Read 36.2 MC Write 32 MC Mixed 31.6 95% 33.3 GB/s	SC Read 23.6 SC Write 32.3 SC Mixed 26.8 79% 27.6 GB/s	Latency 80.2 50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 42: 0P 5R 4G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
38%	51%	35	217	60	74	21.7"	1920 1080	GSM5AB8 LG IPS FULLHD

History: Score 38: 0P 3R 4G 11B | Score 42: 0P 5R 4G 5B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Gaming X Builds (Compare 240 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 46%

Yacht

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 45%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming X

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	26x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $195Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	24x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $190Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	17x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	13x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	13x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	9x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	9x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 275%, 495,311 samples	8x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	9x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	7x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $35Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $441

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48