| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 71.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 29.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME H310M-E R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1080 x 1008 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20220608 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 01 '24 at 16:26 |
| Run Duration | 115 Seconds |
| Run User | ISR-User |
| Background CPU | 54% |
PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
75.1%
Very good
|
76% 136 Pts
|
56% 436 Pts
|
29% 469 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Asus(1043 873C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
71.9%
Very good
|
81% 98.4 fps
|
54% 66.5 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 67 54 67 70 MB/s
|
29.8%
Poor
|
47% 212 MB/s
|
34% 9.47 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905702-022.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
|
31.7%
Below average
|
30% 10.6 GB/s
|
25% 8.87 GB/s
|
48% 82.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 14 | 174 | 13 | 144 | 31.5" | 1080 945 | AOC3202 Q32G2WG3 |
Typical PRIME H310M-E R2.0 Builds (Compare 6,458 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-E R2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,653x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 1,008x |
| Core i7-9700FIntel $279Bench 92%, 54,980 samples | 969x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 699x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $273Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 565x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 363x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Excellent | Total price: $343 |