Lenovo 81W4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 81W4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220516
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '24 at 01:12
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 70.2
1-Core 133
2-Core 265
84% 156 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 571
69% 531 Pts
64-Core 583
36% 583 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Legend(17AA 381C) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.28.10
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Lighting 15.2
Reflection 14.9
Parallax 20.2
12% 16.8 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 15.3
Splatting 16.9
12% 14.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40zmt128g TOSHIBA MEMORY 128GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0105AELA
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,120
Write 219
Mixed 79.3
100% 473 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 90.4
4K Mixed 55.4
175% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 780
DQ Write 42.7
DQ Mixed 355
272% 392 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 172%
Adata DashDrive UV128 USB 3.0 16GB
14GB free, PID db8a
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 143
Write 25.9
Mixed 53.1
74% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 4.1
220% 5.33 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 4471A5244CB0-CWE 8GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.7% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 23.8
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 17.7
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 91.2
44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO81EC
Typical 81W4 Builds (Compare 208 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81W4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback