Intel JSL MRD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel Jasper Lake Client Platform
MotherboardIntel JSL MRD  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230726
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '24 at 23:29
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 78%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5105
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Memory 29.6
1-Core 47.7
2-Core 93.3
31% 56.9 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 113
16% 115 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 5.5
4% 5.53 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 0.3
3% 4.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CYX-SSD-S1000 256GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN12015
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 128 53 84 76 97 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
40% Below average
Read 298
Write 261
Mixed 279
SusWrite 114
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 15.6
4K Mixed 12.1
49% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 147
109% 145 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 40%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 2x6GB
2 of 2 slots used
12GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3733 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.8% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 10.7
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 7.3
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 231
17% 231 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 17 0 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical JSL MRD Builds (Compare 522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel JSL MRD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback