Performance Results


Gaming 82% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-036 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer CH560
Memory	19.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210202
Uptime	7.7 Days
Run Date	Jan 31 '24 at 19:52
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10875H 35,361 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 122 2-Core 208 79% 138 Pts	4-Core 297 8-Core 299 40% 298 Pts	64-Core 299 18% 299 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 (Laptop) 16,265 User benchmarks, average bench 125% Device(1A58 200F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 551.23 Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	118% Outstanding	Lighting 158 Reflection 183 Parallax 178 128% 173 fps	MRender 168 Gravity 130 Splatting 119 111% 139 fps
Poor: 96% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 144%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PSSD T7 2TB 567 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 716GB free Firmware: 0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 540 Write 491 Mixed 494 114% 509 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 33.1 4K Mixed 24.4 78% 25.5 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 32.5 48% 90.6 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 100%
Nvme CA5-8D1024 1TB 641 User benchmarks, average bench 181% 372GB free (System drive) Firmware: CQA0904 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 314 305 274 294 298 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	135% Outstanding	Read 1310 Write 243 Mixed 356 SusWrite 289 119% 549 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 76.6 4K Mixed 38.7 137% 48.8 MB/s	DQ Read 763 DQ Write 267 DQ Mixed 326 290% 452 MB/s
Poor: 98% ↑ This bench: 135% Great: 249%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$149 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 1TB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 861 901 1080 1093 1081 1114 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	230% Outstanding	Read 1,853 Write 1,622 Mixed 1,474 SusWrite 1,021 335% 1,493 MB/s	4K Read 48.3 4K Write 87 4K Mixed 62.1 199% 65.8 MB/s	DQ Read 841 DQ Write 587 DQ Mixed 676 515% 701 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 230% Great: 435%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NMSO416F82-3200E 2x16GB 253 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	68.3% Good	MC Read 22.9 MC Write 27 MC Mixed 22.7 69% 24.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 27.1 SC Mixed 18.2 57% 20 GB/s	Latency 70.3 57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 83%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	65	51	60	37.5"	1280 720	DELA0F4 DELL U3818DW

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

CPU
Core i7-10875HIntelBench 79%, 35,361 samples	737x

GPU
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples	337x
RTX 3080 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 125%, 16,265 samples	210x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	181x

SSD
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00A00 1TBSamsungBench 254%, 2,748 samples	321x
CA5-8D1024 1TBNvmeBench 181%, 641 samples	185x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TBSamsungBench 275%, 9,396 samples	45x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	221x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples	173x
NMSO416F82-3200E 2x16GBUnknownBench 75%, 253 samples	101x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16