Intel X79F1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel X79F1  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221018
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 31 '24 at 16:54
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User GEO-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 67.5
2-Core 136
59% 95.9 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 553
51% 426 Pts
64-Core 781
48% 781 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.2% Average
Lighting 60.9
Reflection 63.4
Parallax 82.3
50% 68.9 fps
MRender 65.6
Gravity 70
Splatting 46.8
48% 60.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD322GJ 320GB
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 96 112 112 119 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 97.5
Write 111
Mixed 61.6
SusWrite 110
70% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 81%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
304GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 178 181 182 183 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 178
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 181
103% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
128% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18KSF51272PZ- 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55% Above average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 18.8
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 10.5
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 23.5" 1920 1017 DWE0236 21.5 monitor
Typical X79F1 Builds (Compare 205 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Intel X79F1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback