Xenta 1896908

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemXenta 1896908  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME H610M-A D4
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230811
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJan 31 '24 at 13:05
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-12100-$112
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 69.5
1-Core 170
2-Core 309
97% 183 Pts
4-Core 537
8-Core 797
83% 667 Pts
64-Core 801
50% 801 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 730
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1371
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
4.8% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 13.1
Parallax 8.3
6% 9.47 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 4.1
3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.8%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green SN350 500GB 2G0C
326GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 236030WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 612 217 211 218 219 221 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 1,274
Write 1,356
Mixed 1,138
SusWrite 283
227% 1,013 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 58.8
216% 82.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,196
DQ Write 915
DQ Mixed 879
706% 997 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 181%
Great: 226%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA32A.C8FR 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16.3
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 15.5
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23.5" 1280 720 HSD49B7 HE247DPB
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback