Lenovo 30A0CTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 30A0CTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '24 at 10:43
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3-$170
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 75.5
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 171
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 297
35% 271 Pts
64-Core 309
19% 309 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Device(107D 2787) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.1% Average
Lighting 51.8
Reflection 55.4
Parallax 50.4
42% 52.5 fps
MRender 62.8
Gravity 49.1
Splatting 44.4
42% 52.1 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingsman 2TB 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN13624
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 346 356 368 369 367 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.6% Good
Read 390
Write 419
Mixed 389
SusWrite 345
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 19.5
68% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 284
203% 257 MB/s
Kingsman 2TB 2TB
982GB free
Firmware: SN13624
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 349 354 371 368 367 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.4% Very good
Read 410
Write 433
Mixed 395
SusWrite 346
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 28.2
4K Mixed 19.5
69% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 277
205% 269 MB/s
Kingsman 2TB 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SN13624
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 349 356 373 370 369 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.9% Good
Read 418
Write 432
Mixed 395
SusWrite 347
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 28.6
4K Mixed 19.1
68% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 274
199% 256 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU7AFR8A-PB 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
58.7% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 18
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 18.7
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 58 60 23.8" 1280 720 AOC2402 24G2W1G3-
Typical 30A0CTO1WW Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 30A0CTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $92
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback