Asrock FM2A55M-HD+

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	67.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	54.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A55M-HD+ (all builds)
Memory	0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150522
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 31 '24 at 04:58
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	44%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka) 15,719 User benchmarks, average bench 41% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	48.3% Average	Memory 70.6 1-Core 59.4 2-Core 107 49% 79.1 Pts	4-Core 152 8-Core 160 21% 156 Pts	64-Core 156 10% 156 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 872A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.23 Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	67.7% Good	Lighting 83.3 Reflection 83.9 Parallax 77.4 68% 81.5 fps	MRender 108 Gravity 76.9 Splatting 68.6 67% 84.7 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot P210 128GB 1,174 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: V1123A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 193 200 188 99 100 MB/s Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54.4% Above average	Read 228 Write 199 Mixed 212 SusWrite 158 45% 199 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 61.7 4K Mixed 19.5 101% 36.6 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 147 DQ Mixed 30.7 51% 96.6 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 85%
Netac 240GB 240GB 2,483 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 25GB free Firmware: FW210715 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 12 7.7 24 65 72 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.6% Poor	Read 201 Write 193 Mixed 166 SusWrite 41 34% 150 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 33.3 4K Mixed 0.5 58% 20 MB/s	DQ Read 28.7 DQ Write 44.9 DQ Mixed 0.5 11% 24.7 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT2GC64B8HC0NF-CG 1x2GB 118 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	24% Poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 7.2 22% 7.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 7 20% 7.03 GB/s	Latency 98 41% 98 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	25	4	60	20"	1280 720	ACR0236 Acer E202HV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A55M-HD+ Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A55M-HD+

CPU
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	6x
A4-5300 APUAMD $36Bench 40%, 7,032 samples	5x
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples	4x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	4x
Radeon HD 6570AMDBench 5%, 19,220 samples	3x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x
SSD 120GBBench 68%, 22,748 samples	2x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	4x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	3x
16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 1x4GBMicronBench 25%, 467 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $116

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16