Lenovo 81FV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81FV  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190614
Uptime10 Days
Run DateJan 30 '24 at 19:20
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 93
1-Core 117
2-Core 198
80% 136 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 520
53% 427 Pts
64-Core 508
31% 508 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 39FE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Lighting 29.6
Reflection 29
Parallax 29.3
24% 29.3 fps
MRender 33.2
Gravity 31.4
Splatting 19.3
22% 28 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 25%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 39FE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.31% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 6.7
5% 6.8 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 9.4
7% 8.13 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.31%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,240
Write 1,980
Mixed 1,625
433% 1,948 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 85.9
4K Mixed 60.7
198% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 841
DQ Write 543
DQ Mixed 729
534% 704 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD Kingston 99U5700-027.A00G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 23.6
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 25.1
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 27.2" 1280 720 GSM7706 LG HDR 4K
Typical 81FV Builds (Compare 4,105 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81FV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback