HP EliteBook 645 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP EliteBook 645 14 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8B12
Memory4.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230704
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJan 30 '24 at 13:57
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 66.1
1-Core 140
2-Core 219
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 333
38% 298 Pts
64-Core 416
26% 416 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 8B12) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.10.18.09
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
8.94% Terrible
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 10.6
9% 11.6 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 9.3
Splatting 16.5
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.94%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-256G-1006 256GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 797 660 331 307 282 246 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1,891
Write 1,273
Mixed 1,314
SusWrite 437
273% 1,229 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 85.3
4K Mixed 48.4
173% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 420
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 357
259% 341 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 170%
Great: 297%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4S2S8MF-16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
41.3% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 13.3
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 15.4
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 32 11 72 23.5" 1280 720 SAM0D2C C24F390
Typical EliteBook 645 14 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 645 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback