Acer Nitro ANV15-51

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro ANV15-51  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL Sportage_RTH
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230901
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJan 30 '24 at 10:35
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13420H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 68.8
1-Core 181
2-Core 361
105% 204 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 891
82% 683 Pts
64-Core 1,089
67% 1,089 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 171E) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4889
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Lighting 13.5
Reflection 21
Parallax 15.2
11% 16.6 fps
MRender 20.3
Gravity 19.4
Splatting 16.4
15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014 1TB
684GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73101100 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3320
Write 3569
Mixed 2,188
674% 3,026 MB/s
4K Read 72.6
4K Write 230
4K Mixed 81.2
336% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,798
DQ Write 1,225
DQ Mixed 1,534
1,139% 1,519 MB/s
Poor: 236% Great: 574%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G52C42S5.M4GB Hynix HMCG66AGBSA092N 16GB
5200, 5600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
133% Outstanding
MC Read 54.4
MC Write 49.9
MC Mixed 48.8
146% 51 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 46
SC Mixed 27.7
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 94.7
42% 94.7 ns
Poor: 108%
This bench: 133%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 8 144 15.5" 1536 793 AUOAF90
Typical Nitro ANV15-51 Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Acer Nitro ANV15-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback