Gigabyte GA-A320M-DS2-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	60.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte A320M-DS2
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-DS2-CF (all builds)
Memory	2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180213
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 30 '24 at 08:37
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	27%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Memory 69 1-Core 99.5 2-Core 173 65% 114 Pts	4-Core 166 8-Core 173 22% 169 Pts	64-Core 166 10% 166 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Asus(1043 874D) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.23 Performing below potential (78^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	60.2% Good	Lighting 78.4 Reflection 77.6 Parallax 73.9 64% 76.6 fps	MRender 62.6 Gravity 73 Splatting 60.4 53% 65.3 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
AP-SSD-A1-128 128GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0722A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 61 61 19 43 56 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	36.2% Below average	Read 376 Write 336 Mixed 122 SusWrite 55.9 49% 222 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 15.2 4K Mixed 1.2 34% 10.8 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 225 DQ Mixed 30.7 69% 139 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 95%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 339GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 109 110 109 111 110 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 81.7 Write 82.3 Mixed 73.1 SusWrite 108 64% 86.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 180% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 78.CAGPN.4050C 1x8GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2866 MHz Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 14.5 36% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 15.3 44% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 95.5 42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 34: 0P 2R 3G 15B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
34%	41%	49	148	20	144	23.5"	1920 1080	MSI3BA0 MSI G24C4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-DS2-CF Builds (Compare 194 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-DS2-CF

CPU
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	33x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	25x
Ryzen 5 1500XAMD $131Bench 66%, 70,038 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	39x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	13x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	12x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	8x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	7x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	7x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	8x
Aegis DDR4 2133 C15 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 37%, 8,300 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $185

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16