Asrock Z790 Nova WiFi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 233%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 301%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 125%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics192% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive662% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsrock Z790 Nova WiFi  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock Z790 Nova WiFi
Memory56.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '24 at 23:43
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-14700K-$375
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Memory 75.6
1-Core 234
2-Core 458
130% 256 Pts
4-Core 925
8-Core 1,757
160% 1,341 Pts
64-Core 3,830
237% 3,830 Pts
Poor: 124%
This bench: 125%
Great: 134%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
192% Outstanding
Lighting 276
Reflection 270
Parallax 287
225% 278 fps
MRender 317
Gravity 241
Splatting 179
193% 245 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 192%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$149
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620361WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4312 4594 4680 4813 4897 2623 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
662% Outstanding
Read 4,525
Write 4901
Mixed 3,548
SusWrite 4,320
975% 4,323 MB/s
4K Read 85.5
4K Write 285
4K Mixed 112
423% 161 MB/s
DQ Read 2,181
DQ Write 1,805
DQ Mixed 2,009
1,500% 1,998 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 662%
Great: 685%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
628GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 486 486 483 485 484 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 483
Mixed 458
SusWrite 484
109% 482 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 59.4
197% 69.4 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 339
255% 342 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
2TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 184 185 180 184 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 179
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 183
103% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
164% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
Seagate ST4000NM0085-1YY107 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: NN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 215 215 214 215 213 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 208
Write 204
Mixed 95.7
SusWrite 214
132% 180 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1
260% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 121%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6400J3239G322x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
158% Outstanding
MC Read 63.2
MC Write 61.8
MC Mixed 58.8
175% 61.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 51.4
SC Mixed 33.2
102% 35.8 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 150%
This bench: 158%
Great: 218%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 175 34.8" 1280 720 DELA1E4 Dell AW3423DW
Typical Z790 Nova WiFi Builds (Compare 161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 460%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 127%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 611%
UFO

System: Asrock Z790 Nova WiFi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $2,419
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback