HP ProDesk 400 G3 DM (Brazil)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive74% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G3 DM (Brazil)  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82A5
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '24 at 18:31
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 76.3
1-Core 95
2-Core 190
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 313
41% 307 Pts
64-Core 319
20% 319 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 82A5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
5.31% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 7.2
5% 5.9 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 11.8
6% 6.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.31%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xraydisk 480GB SSD 480GB
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2227I
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 340 377 338 331 332 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 431
Write 387
Mixed 360
SusWrite 345
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 57.7
4K Mixed 11.1
88% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 16.3
75% 165 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 74%
Great: 92%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
10GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 8.3 7 6.2 7 7.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 57.9
Write 17
Mixed 14.9
SusWrite 7
25% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
40% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 10
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 10.4
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 87.8
46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 35%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 23.8" 1280 720 GSM5BDE LG FULL HD
Typical ProDesk 400 G3 DM (Brazil) Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G3 DM (Brazil)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback