Lenovo 4157FH6

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	56.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 4157FH6 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100729
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 29 '24 at 14:38
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	39%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3550 7,649 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1366-pin LGA, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Memory 91 1-Core 81.4 2-Core 149 66% 107 Pts	4-Core 250 8-Core 353 38% 302 Pts	64-Core 342 21% 342 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6163) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56.1% Above average	Lighting 68.6 Reflection 76.1 Parallax 67.3 56% 70.7 fps	MRender 65.7 Gravity 70.1 Splatting 69.9 56% 68.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$75 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 288GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 183 227 234 239 239 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	68% Good	Read 246 Write 233 Mixed 231 SusWrite 212 52% 230 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 48 4K Mixed 36.3 117% 38.1 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 172 134% 185 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 129%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 2TB 519 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1TB free, PID 0826 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 54.6 Write 22.7 Mixed 20.1 SusWrite 18.6 34% 29 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.8 44% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 53%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 660GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5 5.1 5.2 5.1 5.2 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 249 Write 4.7 Mixed 7 SusWrite 5.1 48% 66.5 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Mixed 0 179% 16.1 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x4GB 39,448 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM 15h Reserved 1066 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	43.8% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 16.7 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 11.5 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	52	60	24.1"	1280 720	HPN3485 HP Z24n G2

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 4157FH6 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

System: Lenovo 4157FH6

CPU
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	1x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	1x

RAM
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $192

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16