Microsoft Surface Studio 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics77.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicrosoft Surface Studio 2  (all builds)
MotherboardMicrosoft Surface Studio 2
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display4500 x 3000 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 28 '24 at 16:19
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820HQ
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 80
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 188
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 496
52% 417 Pts
64-Core 488
30% 488 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070
Microsoft(1414 0020) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1982 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.4% Very good
Lighting 94.1
Reflection 121
Parallax 94.1
77% 103 fps
MRender 91.3
Gravity 93.5
Splatting 101
79% 95.4 fps
Poor: 73%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 80%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
655GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AAMS4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 508 423 324 351 650 639 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 959
Write 730
Mixed 462
SusWrite 482
147% 658 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 46.6
4K Mixed 30
92% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 506
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 358
264% 356 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 112%
Great: 251%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 25.5
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 23.4
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 62 43 60 28.4" 1280 720 SHP1498
Typical Surface Studio 2 Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: Microsoft Surface Studio 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback