MSI X99S SLI PLUS (MS-7885)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99S SLI PLUS (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180615
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJan 28 '24 at 09:43
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$504
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 94.4
1-Core 119
2-Core 229
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 822
76% 635 Pts
64-Core 1,333
82% 1,333 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0C 500GB
299GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 498 430 322 320 314 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 662
Write 578
Mixed 606
SusWrite 385
125% 558 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 82.1
4K Mixed 50.8
164% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 596
DQ Write 466
DQ Mixed 521
393% 528 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 125%
Great: 238%
V Series SATA SSD 120GB
90GB free
Firmware: V2.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 98 65 66 67 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 441
Write 338
Mixed 288
SusWrite 88.3
64% 289 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 10.8
81% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 18.5
48% 100 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 85%
SSD 360GB 360GB
267GB free
Firmware: Q1204B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 329 339 356 350 359 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 462
Write 402
Mixed 345
SusWrite 320
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 79
4K Mixed 18.2
98% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 90.4
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 23
70% 145 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 84%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
392GB free
Firmware: UH4504RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 82 136 161 176 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 433
Write 377
Mixed 167
SusWrite 145
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 29.5
4K Mixed 15
66% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 98.1
DQ Mixed 16.6
37% 77.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
152GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 188 188 188 188 188 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 135
Mixed 82.8
SusWrite 184
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 113%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
3GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 9.7 12 11 12 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 64.9
Write 16.6
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 10.7
26% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
92% 8.27 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4BL.M8FE 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 49.4
MC Write 42
MC Mixed 42.7
128% 44.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 23.9
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 57.6
70% 57.6 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 116%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 59 0 0" 1280 720
Typical X99S SLI PLUS (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 1,040 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X99S SLI PLUS (MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $508
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback