Asus TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics60.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DV
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 27 '24 at 23:19
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
43.3% Average
Memory 36.1
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 162
52% 97.8 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 441
44% 356 Pts
64-Core 427
26% 427 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 140F) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.5% Good
Lighting 67.5
Reflection 99.4
Parallax 66.1
55% 77.7 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 76.4
Splatting 75.9
71% 88.9 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 83%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA0V4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 673 514 501 407 397 396 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 825
Write 905
Mixed 842
SusWrite 481
172% 763 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 32.3
108% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 454
DQ Write 475
DQ Mixed 482
357% 470 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 117%
Great: 181%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X16GE2666C18S2 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6.8
19% 6.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 5.2
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 224
18% 224 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 19%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 12: 0P 0R 3G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
12% 11% 57 91 27 60 15.5" 1280 720 NCP002D
Typical TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV Builds (Compare 702 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback