Illegear SELENITE X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemIllegear SELENITE X  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard Standard
Memory21.5 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 27 '24 at 16:20
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 69.9
1-Core 104
2-Core 182
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 450
46% 369 Pts
64-Core 774
48% 774 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Device(1D05 1174) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5123
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32% Below average
Lighting 30
Reflection 30
Parallax 30
24% 30 fps
MRender 93.9
Gravity 47.8
Splatting 39.1
47% 60.3 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 32%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ1T0HALB-00000 1TB
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 163 156 168 142 148 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 758
Write 215
Mixed 336
SusWrite 154
80% 366 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 69.7
4K Mixed 33.7
125% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 624
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 254
223% 347 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 251%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905790-041.A00G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h 5200 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
120% Outstanding
MC Read 50
MC Write 43.6
MC Mixed 48.6
136% 47.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 22.4
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 125%
This bench: 120%
Great: 168%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 240 17.2" 1280 720 BOE0A8F
Typical SELENITE X Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

System: Illegear SELENITE X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback