Asus PRIME Z270-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 4 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270-K  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161122
Uptime12.8 Days
Run DateJan 27 '24 at 13:14
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 75.7
1-Core 109
2-Core 202
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 581
59% 478 Pts
64-Core 604
37% 604 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.3% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 104
Parallax 95
82% 100 fps
MRender 90.9
Gravity 95.4
Splatting 92.2
76% 92.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 452
Write 408
Mixed 365
91% 408 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 77
4K Mixed 47
154% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 349
262% 350 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
87GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 132 132 134 132 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 165
Write 169
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 133
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 112%
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$30
159GB free
Firmware: LVD1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 69 70 70 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 50.9
Write 78.4
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 70.4
40% 55.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.6
316% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8213.C16FBR 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
36% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 10.7
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 10.9
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 24" 1280 720 AOC2460 2460G5
Typical PRIME Z270-K Builds (Compare 2,337 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-K - $74

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $657
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback