Dell OptiPlex 3000

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics8.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
SystemDell OptiPlex 3000
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 3000  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220622
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 27 '24 at 09:55
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500-$179
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 74.7
1-Core 174
2-Core 334
102% 194 Pts
4-Core 684
8-Core 1052
107% 868 Pts
64-Core 1,184
73% 1,184 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Dell(1028 0AC5) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
8.17% Terrible
Lighting 9.3
Reflection 14.2
Parallax 10.8
8% 11.4 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 10.2
9% 11.6 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.17%
Great: 8%
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Nvidia(10DE 128B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.37% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 4
Parallax 4.3
3% 4.1 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.37%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,210
Write 890
Mixed 383
182% 828 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 92.7
275% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 780
DQ Write 574
DQ Mixed 247
301% 534 MB/s
Poor: 103% Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CB16GU2666.C8ET 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 30.8
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 26.1
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 19.4" 1280 720 DELA15A DELL E2020H
Typical OptiPlex 3000 Builds (Compare 655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 3000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback