Asrock EP2C602-4L/D16

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock EP2C602-4L/D16  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 27 '24 at 01:34
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
CPUSocket, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 65.7
1-Core 68.2
2-Core 137
53% 90.2 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 575
53% 442 Pts
64-Core 1,582
98% 1,582 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
Asus(1043 8919) ≥ 4GB; asus 4060 dual
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
124% Outstanding
Lighting 171
Reflection 108
Parallax 146
139% 142 fps
MRender 195
Gravity 127
Splatting 104
112% 142 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 124%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 239
Write 148
Mixed 175
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 21.4
85% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 123
96% 131 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 73%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
147GB free
Firmware: 00WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 388 386 385 380 381 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 375
Write 378
Mixed 290
SusWrite 384
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 37.6
119% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 257
199% 274 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 111%
Marvell Raid VD 0 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MV.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 190 192 192 189 193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 257
Write 138
Mixed 96.9
SusWrite 189
124% 170 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 1.2
299% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 128%
Great: 157%
Asmt 2135 6TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 171 171 170 171 171 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 150
Mixed 133
SusWrite 171
114% 155 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.3
412% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A 99U5471-054.A 9965525-144.A 9965525-138.A 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.9% Average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 17.4
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 5.6
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 23.5" 1280 720 SAM729F S24R35A
Typical EP2C602-4L/D16 Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock EP2C602-4L/D16

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback