MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 196%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics197% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive89.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C56
MotherboardMSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)  (all builds)
Memory21.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231011
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '24 at 23:48
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$168
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 87.9
1-Core 173
2-Core 327
106% 196 Pts
4-Core 642
8-Core 1,090
105% 866 Pts
64-Core 1,490
92% 1,490 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 104%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
Gigabyte(1458 2332) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
197% Outstanding
Lighting 245
Reflection 252
Parallax 507
200% 334 fps
MRender 415
Gravity 211
Splatting 332
261% 319 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 197%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS3030 250GB SSD
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS303321
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 277 276 266 278 262 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 212
Write 702
Mixed 348
SusWrite 287
89% 387 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 35.3
157% 61.3 MB/s
DQ Read 425
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 341
260% 356 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 214%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
45GB free
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 29 24 27 24 27 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.3% Below average
Read 284
Write 35
Mixed 39
SusWrite 26
20% 96 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 14.8
4K Mixed 10.5
60% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 23.4
DQ Write 12.4
DQ Mixed 14.9
12% 16.9 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 102%
SHPP41-1000GM 1TB
158GB free
Firmware: 51060A20
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2504
Write 2,085
Mixed 1,928
483% 2,172 MB/s
4K Read 60.1
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 77.9
251% 83.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,297
DQ Write 997
DQ Mixed 952
765% 1,082 MB/s
Poor: 263% Great: 556%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
74GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 128 165 161 162 159 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 129
Write 131
Mixed 75.9
SusWrite 154
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$74
214GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 104 110 122 126 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 89.7
Write 136
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 110
73% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
47% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GVKB F4-3200C16-8GVGB F4-3200C16-8GVKB F4-3200C16-8GVGB 32GB
3266, 3266, 3266, 3266 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 36.7
94% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 30.9
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 39.1
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 24 280 24.5" 1920 1080 AUS25A9 VG259QM
Typical MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) Builds (Compare 16,045 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $674
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback