HP h9-1442eo

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP h9-1442eo  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AD5
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130318
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJan 26 '24 at 15:20
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 78
1-Core 92.9
2-Core 182
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 451
47% 378 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Nvidia(10DE 100C) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.1% Poor
Lighting 33.3
Reflection 33.2
Parallax 44.2
27% 36.9 fps
MRender 45.7
Gravity 42.6
Splatting 35.1
33% 41.1 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 411040WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 252 219 239 253 261 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 423
Write 369
Mixed 312
SusWrite 255
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 33.3
107% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 249
207% 299 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 111%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
931GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 192 194 193 196 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 208
Write 176
Mixed 104
SusWrite 190
124% 170 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.8
190% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 114%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-158.A00LF 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
45.9% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 14.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 14.7
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 30 27" 1280 720 DEL41B0 DELL U2720Q
Typical h9-1442eo Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: HP h9-1442eo

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $535
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback