Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LH_FX506LH

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	83.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

4 months ago, 3 months ago.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LH_FX506LH (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX506LH
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20211126
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Jan 26 '24 at 10:05
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	BGD-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10300H 82,821 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	Memory 87.3 1-Core 125 2-Core 233 84% 148 Pts	4-Core 368 8-Core 528 56% 448 Pts	64-Core 559 35% 559 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 177F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7985 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	5.36% Terrible	Lighting 5.9 Reflection 6.2 Parallax 6.9 5% 6.33 fps	MRender 6.6 Gravity 6 Splatting 10 6% 7.53 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.36% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Zadak TWSG3 256GB 80 User benchmarks, average bench 204% 190GB free (System drive) Firmware: V1.8 SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 281 277 276 274 273 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Read 540 Write 286 Mixed 305 SusWrite 276 78% 351 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 97.5 4K Mixed 28.3 122% 49.3 MB/s	DQ Read 90.8 DQ Write 291 DQ Mixed 121 113% 168 MB/s
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 270%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GB 28,935 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.3% Below average	MC Read 15 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 10.4 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 13.5 SC Mixed 11.5 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 68.4 58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 6: 0P 1R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
6%	7%	30	215	59	144	15.5"	1280 720	NCP004D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LH_FX506LH Builds (Compare 5,220 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LH_FX506LH

CPU
Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples	4,848x
Core i7-10870HIntelBench 79%, 23,498 samples	288x
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	81x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	3,156x
GeForce GTX 1650NvidiaBench 40%, 34,471 samples	2,062x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 3%, 2,203 samples	2x

SSD
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBBench 176%, 33,645 samples	4,151x
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA1T0QFD 1TBBench 219%, 6,851 samples	232x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1002 512GBWDCBench 188%, 12,375 samples	129x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	1,557x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 45%, 34,565 samples	1,067x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	412x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16