Casper NIRVANA DESKTOP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCasper NIRVANA DESKTOP  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER CASPER NIRVANA DESKTOP
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130814
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 26 '24 at 09:25
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User GEO-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 90.3
2-Core 173
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 321
41% 310 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$88
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.6% Poor
Lighting 30.5
Reflection 32.5
Parallax 31.2
25% 31.4 fps
MRender 35.6
Gravity 32.6
Splatting 22.8
24% 30.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X5240G 240GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 119 55 52 88 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 428
Write 316
Mixed 326
SusWrite 91.3
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 19.8
28% 8.37 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
112GB free
Firmware: HP74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 111 117 116 116 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 114
Write 105
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 115
73% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
323GB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 11 11 7.5 7.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 548
Write 1
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 10.2
101% 141 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Mixed 0
950% 7.6 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.M8F 1315 CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
54.1% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 17
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 15.2
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 11: 0P 1R 0G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
11% 24% 29 215 59 60 21.5" 1280 720 VSC692F VX2263 Series
Typical NIRVANA DESKTOP Builds (Compare 653 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA DESKTOP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $188
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback