Onda A68V+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
SystemOnda A68V+  (all builds)
MotherboardOnda A68V+
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '24 at 02:58
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Memory 69.1
1-Core 24.3
2-Core 45
34% 46.1 Pts
4-Core 62.5
8-Core 64.1
8% 63.3 Pts
64-Core 64
4% 64 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
AMD(1002 1313) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
4.68% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 7.2
4% 6.63 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 7
5% 6.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.68%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ramsta S800 120GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RY23V0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 421
Write 379
Mixed 307
82% 369 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 11.3
72% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 95.8
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 17.3
49% 101 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 79%
Samsung HD322GJ 320GB
178GB free
Firmware: 1AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 135 136 137 137 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 132
Write 32.4
Mixed 75.6
SusWrite 136
69% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 81%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150
212GB free
Firmware: JPFOA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 84 83 83 84 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 75.8
Write 71.4
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 83
50% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G3D169DS3.16FP 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.7% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 14.1
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 8.5
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 21.5" 1280 720 VSC0F30 VA2261 Series
Typical A68V+ Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Onda A68V+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback