MSI MEG Z490 GODLIKE (MS-7C70)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 163%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 172%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics162% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive302% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C70
MotherboardMSI MEG Z490 GODLIKE (MS-7C70)  (all builds)
Memory16.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210204
Uptime15.1 Days
Run DateJan 26 '24 at 01:04
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$430
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 96
1-Core 151
2-Core 297
100% 181 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 987
94% 776 Pts
64-Core 1,967
122% 1,967 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
162% Outstanding
Lighting 219
Reflection 198
Parallax 234
179% 217 fps
MRender 245
Gravity 230
Splatting 176
173% 217 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 162%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TB
578GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1777 1548 1488 1462 1485 1495 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
302% Outstanding
Read 2,435
Write 2,267
Mixed 1,836
SusWrite 1,543
454% 2,020 MB/s
4K Read 58
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 74
243% 81.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,032
DQ Write 530
DQ Mixed 752
566% 771 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 302%
Great: 355%
Milan II 512G 512GB
397GB free
Firmware: X6105100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 407 406 396 397 388 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 478
Mixed 272
SusWrite 403
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 86
4K Mixed 46.4
160% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 95.3
137% 256 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3600C16-8GTRS 04CD F4-4000C15-8GTRS 04CD F4-3600C16-8GTRS 04CD F4-4000C15-8GTRS 32GB
4000, 4000, 4000, 4000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
108% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 44
MC Mixed 34.2
113% 39.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 39.8
SC Mixed 27.7
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 55.1
73% 55.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 144 31.5" 1280 720 MSI1462 Optix AG32CQ
Typical MEG Z490 GODLIKE (MS-7C70) Builds (Compare 724 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 206%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 220%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG Z490 GODLIKE (MS-7C70)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $1,718
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback