Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 06CDVY
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210727
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 25 '24 at 17:29
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1065G7
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 62
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 211
67% 124 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 522
55% 441 Pts
64-Core 404
25% 404 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
Dell(1028 08B0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Lighting 14
Reflection 13.4
Parallax 14.7
11% 14 fps
MRender 14.8
Gravity 15.1
Splatting 16.2
13% 15.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40zpz512g NVMe TOSHIBA 512GB
317GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10400104 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 592 591 558 335 342 342 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 887
Write 791
Mixed 819
SusWrite 460
166% 739 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 26.2
95% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 478
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 377
268% 350 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 108%
Great: 167%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4UBE3D4AA-MGCL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
101% Outstanding
MC Read 40.1
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 36.7
112% 39.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 23.9
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 101%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 11: 0P 0R 2G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
11% 20% 35 132 57 60 27" 1280 720 SAM707F LF27T35
Typical XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Builds (Compare 567 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback