Gigabyte Z790 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 399%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 128%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 499%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 133%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics315% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive551% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte Z790 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory52.9 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '24 at 14:02
Run Duration283 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-14700K-$380
U3E1, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Memory 89.1
1-Core 234
2-Core 469
136% 264 Pts
4-Core 939
8-Core 1,765
161% 1352 Pts
64-Core 3,782
234% 3,782 Pts
Poor: 124%
This bench: 133%
Great: 134%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
Gigabyte(1458 40BE) ≥ 4GB; Gigabyte Eagle OC
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5700 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
315% Outstanding
Lighting 476
Reflection 468
Parallax 543
388% 496 fps
MRender 579
Gravity 403
Splatting 284
330% 422 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 315%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2957 3342 3450 3510 3518 3519 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
551% Outstanding
Read 3019
Write 3,555
Mixed 3,193
SusWrite 3,383
744% 3,287 MB/s
4K Read 87
4K Write 273
4K Mixed 134
448% 165 MB/s
DQ Read 2,132
DQ Write 1662
DQ Mixed 1,869
1,406% 1,887 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 551%
Great: 526%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
233GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1714 945 588 587 587 585 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 1,979
Write 1,753
Mixed 765
SusWrite 834
297% 1,333 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 220
4K Mixed 66.8
272% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,037
DQ Write 1,455
DQ Mixed 895
775% 1,129 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 268%
Great: 254%
CT4000P3PSSD8 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4111 4086 4115 3918 3846 3909 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
526% Outstanding
Read 1,962
Write 4,147
Mixed 2,480
SusWrite 3,997
718% 3,147 MB/s
4K Read 60.2
4K Write 308
4K Mixed 100
383% 156 MB/s
DQ Read 2,194
DQ Write 1,692
DQ Mixed 1,949
1,456% 1,945 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 526%
Great: 530%
Sobetter Ext 2TB
360GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 110 114 111 112 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 52.7
Write 61.5
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 112
57% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.5
196% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX5M2B6000C40 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
203% Outstanding
MC Read 83.2
MC Write 80.3
MC Mixed 77.6
230% 80.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 52.8
SC Mixed 36.2
108% 37.7 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 142%
This bench: 203%
Great: 209%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 25" 1280 720 BNQ802A BenQ PD2500Q
Typical GA-Z790 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 9,314 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 291%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 346%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z790 AORUS ELITE AX - $230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $1,493
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback