MSI MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics174% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D52
MotherboardMSI MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52)  (all builds)
Memory50.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230302
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 25 '24 at 08:04
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$369
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 75.8
1-Core 143
2-Core 283
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 551
8-Core 1,057
96% 804 Pts
64-Core 2,488
154% 2,488 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-Ti
MSI(1462 5090) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 22.5GB, Driver: 551.23
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
174% Outstanding
Lighting 253
Reflection 228
Parallax 258
206% 246 fps
MRender 253
Gravity 219
Splatting 151
164% 208 fps
Poor: 205%
This bench: 174%
Great: 247%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
43GB free
Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,878
Write 2,972
Mixed 1,980
513% 2,277 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 97.6
4K Mixed 48.3
162% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,176
DQ Write 902
DQ Mixed 1,090
802% 1,056 MB/s
Poor: 189% Great: 486%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,442
Write 852
Mixed 970
240% 1,088 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 52.3
157% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 681
DQ Write 748
DQ Mixed 577
472% 669 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 199%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
217GB free
Firmware: P3CR021 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1397
Write 1,106
Mixed 1,072
265% 1,191 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 82.8
4K Mixed 57.5
186% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 925
DQ Write 908
DQ Mixed 311
400% 715 MB/s
Poor: 130% Great: 295%
SABRENT 1TB
674GB free
Firmware: RKT343.2
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,257
Write 2,091
Mixed 1,611
1,245% 1,653 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 90.3
4K Mixed 47.8
8,554% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,126
DQ Write 889
DQ Mixed 1,049
9,495% 1,021 MB/s
WD WUH721414ALE604 14TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: LDAZW110
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 118
Write 114
Mixed 90.4
80% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 2.2
435% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 140%
Seagate BUP Slim 2TB
26GB free
Firmware: 1707
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 43.4
Write 78.8
Mixed 63.3
47% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4800 C20 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 32.5
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 31.8
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 93.4
43% 93.4 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 147%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 29: 0P 4R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
29% 10% 88 197 53 60 32" 1280 720 RCA0000 LED_TV
Typical MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52) Builds (Compare 799 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 218%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $980
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback