HP Pro Mini 400 G9 Desktop PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pro Mini 400 G9 Desktop PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8955
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230407
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateJan 25 '24 at 07:52
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G7400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 121
2-Core 205
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 284
37% 278 Pts
64-Core 285
18% 285 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 710
HP(103C 8955) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4146
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
4.06% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 5
3% 5.53 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 6.3
5% 6.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.06%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HBJD-00BH1 256GB
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1NFAV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 101 121 111 116 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 967
Write 106
Mixed 107
SusWrite 119
69% 325 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 37.5
150% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 480
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 177
167% 270 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 106%
Great: 200%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAG68EXNSA051N 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
52.8% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 17.9
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 16.7
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 21.5" 1280 720 IVM562E PLE2283H
Typical Pro Mini 400 G9 Desktop PC Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro Mini 400 G9 Desktop PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback