Lenovo 82R4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
SystemLenovo 82R4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220625
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 24 '24 at 21:37
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
44.5% Average
Memory 50.2
1-Core 55.3
2-Core 105
41% 70.2 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 395
36% 302 Pts
64-Core 650
40% 650 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3F94) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.44.45
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
7.65% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 25.2
7% 17.1 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 14.2
Splatting 7.9
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.65%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW512GZL 512GB
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C01C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 880 25 33 56 127 487 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 1,158
Write 990
Mixed 853
SusWrite 268
182% 817 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 31.6
4K Mixed 29
94% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 417
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 355
259% 341 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 107%
Great: 274%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE M471A1G44BB0-CWE 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
59.8% Above average
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 23.5
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 17.6
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 182
22% 182 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 42 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE08C2
Typical 82R4 Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback