Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive90.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 24 '24 at 16:49
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G5400-$55
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 92.2
2-Core 152
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 206
25% 194 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
AMD(1002 0B04) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
15% Very poor
Lighting 16.3
Reflection 26.9
Parallax 22.1
13% 21.8 fps
MRender 25.1
Gravity 16.6
Splatting 24.7
18% 22.1 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV8-CE256 256GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C180902
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 275 249 273 267 270 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 398
Mixed 396
SusWrite 266
86% 386 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 38.7
128% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 125
155% 275 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
839GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 168 166 172 172 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 111
Mixed 111
SusWrite 169
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
237% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
455GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 131 128 131 130 131 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 89.3
Write 89
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 130
68% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
209% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.9% Very good
MC Read 25
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 23.1
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 23.3
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 8 60 18.5" 1280 720 AOC1954 T954we
Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR Builds (Compare 1,377 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $258
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback