Lenovo 20HHCTO1WW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20HHCTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20HHCTO1WW
Memory56.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 24 '24 at 16:17
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 109
2-Core 194
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 462
51% 405 Pts
64-Core 476
29% 476 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2200
Legend(17AA 224D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1377 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.79
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Lighting 23.1
Reflection 34.9
Parallax 34.6
19% 30.9 fps
MRender 27.8
Gravity 25.4
Splatting 22.9
20% 25.4 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WD5000LPLX-08ZNTT0 2TB
346GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MU020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 268 267 274 276 271 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 366
Write 392
Mixed 337
SusWrite 261
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 52.8
4K Mixed 27.8
92% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 193
165% 239 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
79.9% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 26.1
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 24.2
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 59 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical 20HHCTO1WW Builds (Compare 156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20HHCTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback