MSI ZH77A-G43 (MS-7758)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics98.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive58% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7758
MotherboardMSI ZH77A-G43 (MS-7758)  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20131029
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 24 '24 at 14:03
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 77.4
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 188
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 430
46% 367 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Device(7377 111E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.65
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 134
Parallax 125
102% 128 fps
MRender 95.8
Gravity 126
Splatting 113
92% 112 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxsun 256GB X6 256GB
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0311A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 175 78 66 66 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
58% Above average
Read 473
Write 382
Mixed 121
SusWrite 114
60% 273 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 69.6
4K Mixed 1.6
83% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 22.2
73% 155 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58%
Great: 90%
Team T2531TB 1TB
294GB free
Firmware: U1013A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 281 400 411 415 414 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 476
Write 374
Mixed 391
SusWrite 357
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 0.7
69% 162 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 104%
Team T253X1240G 240GB
27GB free
Firmware: V1.2.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 186 236 236 215 207 MB/s
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
70.7% Very good
Read 241
Write 239
Mixed 220
SusWrite 206
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 38.2
131% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 187
136% 177 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 92%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46
56GB free
Firmware: 4.AAB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 49 51 51 51 51 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 113
Write 18.5
Mixed 44
SusWrite 50.5
42% 56.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 42%
WD WD20EZAZ-00WGYX0 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 143 165 169 168 167 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 25% Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX318C10F/8 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.1
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 17
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 49: 0P 5R 8G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
49% 27% 49 218 60 60 72.3" 1280 720 MEI21C3 Panasonic-TV
Typical ZH77A-G43 (MS-7758) Builds (Compare 302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI ZH77A-G43 (MS-7758)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $465
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback