Asus TUF GAMING H670-PRO WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 503%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 128%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 621%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 133%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics399% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive624% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING H670-PRO WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory57.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231208
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 24 '24 at 06:43
Run Duration285 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-14700K-$380
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Memory 93.7
1-Core 230
2-Core 460
136% 261 Pts
4-Core 919
8-Core 1,763
159% 1,341 Pts
64-Core 3,620
224% 3,620 Pts
Poor: 124%
This bench: 133%
Great: 134%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,756
Asus(1043 88E6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 546.65
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
399% Outstanding
Lighting 650
Reflection 579
Parallax 712
529% 647 fps
MRender 526
Gravity 567
Splatting 296
362% 463 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 399%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$89
813GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620361WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4660 4660 4655 4638 3959 1045 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
624% Outstanding
Read 4308
Write 4,621
Mixed 3,282
SusWrite 3,936
910% 4,037 MB/s
4K Read 74.6
4K Write 260
4K Mixed 100
379% 145 MB/s
DQ Read 2,368
DQ Write 1,952
DQ Mixed 2,147
1,611% 2,156 MB/s
Poor: 251%
This bench: 624%
Great: 598%
Patriot Burst Elite 120GB
3GB free
Firmware: V4.15.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 468
Write 419
Mixed 347
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 97.5
4K Mixed 22.4
138% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 29.7
72% 148 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 91%
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002 1TB
507GB free
Firmware: STNSC016
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3835 3911 3912 3894 1593 881 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
464% Outstanding
Read 2,015
Write 3,110
Mixed 2,198
SusWrite 3,004
586% 2,582 MB/s
4K Read 57.6
4K Write 296
4K Mixed 94.8
365% 149 MB/s
DQ Read 2,243
DQ Write 1,756
DQ Mixed 2,104
1,545% 2,034 MB/s
Poor: 177%
This bench: 464%
Great: 492%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
893GB free
Firmware: AX0P3D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 110 109 109 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 104
Write 95.6
Mixed 36.2
SusWrite 109
63% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3600C18-16GVK 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 44.4
MC Write 43.6
MC Mixed 41.7
124% 43.2 GB/s
SC Read 27.3
SC Write 39.6
SC Mixed 36.5
98% 34.5 GB/s
Latency 59.4
67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 119%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 0 72.3" 1280 720 GSMC0C8 LG TV SSCR2
Typical TUF GAMING H670-PRO WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 1,471 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 170%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 173%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING H670-PRO WIFI D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $805
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback