Lenovo 30A6003KUK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 30A6003KUK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 102F
Memory33 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181015
Uptime13.6 Days
Run DateJan 24 '24 at 02:41
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 86.5
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 186
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 578
55% 454 Pts
64-Core 720
45% 720 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 2050 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.7% Below average
Lighting 45.9
Reflection 51.6
Parallax 65.5
37% 54.3 fps
MRender 54.1
Gravity 53.5
Splatting 37.2
38% 48.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSFJ256GCSU 256GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 264 224 225 279 327 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 475
Write 438
Mixed 267
SusWrite 279
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 60.3
4K Mixed 36.6
105% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 324
244% 328 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 100%
WD easystore 264D 8TB
6.5TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 186 190 187 198 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 197
Mixed 134
SusWrite 191
241% 177 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 9
4K Mixed 1.3
364% 4.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1
DQ Write 4.9
DQ Mixed 1.7
228% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 99%
WD easystore 264D 8TB
3.5TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 51.2
Write 37
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 37
51% 39.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.6
166% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 99%
WD easystore 264D 8TB
2TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 51.2
Write 37
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 37.1
50% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.5
165% 2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF 6x8GB
6 of 8 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 33.6
100% 34.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 20
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 203 59 0 84.6" 1280 720 SAM7140 Q90A
Typical 30A6003KUK Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

System: Lenovo 30A6003KUK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback