HP ProBook 445 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ProBook 445 14 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 89C9
Memory7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230323
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJan 23 '24 at 23:18
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5625U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 58.1
1-Core 156
2-Core 294
88% 169 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 681
74% 585 Pts
64-Core 829
51% 829 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 89C9) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.26.08
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 14.2
Parallax 25.5
14% 19.1 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 20.7
Splatting 20.1
14% 16.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80000C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 366 355 359 357 361 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 918
Write 644
Mixed 445
SusWrite 363
132% 592 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 86.2
4K Mixed 38
146% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 86.2
DQ Mixed 38.7
54% 102 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 110%
Great: 164%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4S2S8MF-16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.3% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 11.7
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 12.5
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 59 44 60 14" 1280 720 AUO229E
Typical ProBook 445 14 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 445 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback