Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z790 FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 329%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 124%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 412%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 127%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics270% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive530% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS Z790 FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory53.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '24 at 21:53
Run Duration430 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900KF-$505
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Memory 75.9
1-Core 239
2-Core 479
134% 265 Pts
4-Core 948
8-Core 1,672
158% 1,310 Pts
64-Core 3,698
229% 3,698 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 127%
Great: 136%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,756
PNY(196E 13AD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3300 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
270% Outstanding
Lighting 365
Reflection 430
Parallax 642
297% 479 fps
MRender 536
Gravity 572
Splatting 220
340% 443 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 270%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 990 PRO 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0B2QJXG7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3850 4008 4153 4157 4441 2898 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
530% Outstanding
Read 2,521
Write 4,534
Mixed 2,857
SusWrite 3918
786% 3,458 MB/s
4K Read 89.6
4K Write 240
4K Mixed 121
418% 150 MB/s
DQ Read 1,614
DQ Write 1,093
DQ Mixed 1,271
971% 1,326 MB/s
Poor: 271%
This bench: 530%
Great: 660%
Nvme Corsair MP600 PRO XT 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: EIFM31.4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4931 5047 5056 5078 5130 5137 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
613% Outstanding
Read 2,769
Write 3010
Mixed 2,973
SusWrite 5,063
784% 3,454 MB/s
4K Read 72.2
4K Write 281
4K Mixed 108
396% 154 MB/s
DQ Read 1855
DQ Write 1,364
DQ Mixed 1,368
1,088% 1,529 MB/s
Poor: 449%
This bench: 613%
Great: 665%
Nvme Corsair MP600 PRO XT 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: EIFM31.4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4690 4734 2743 1452 1256 1235 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
448% Outstanding
Read 2,560
Write 3,471
Mixed 2,702
SusWrite 2685
646% 2,855 MB/s
4K Read 55.7
4K Write 245
4K Mixed 99.4
342% 133 MB/s
DQ Read 1,978
DQ Write 1,444
DQ Mixed 1,557
1,206% 1,660 MB/s
Poor: 449%
This bench: 448%
Great: 665%
Nvme Samsung SSD 990 PRO 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0B2QJXG7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4445 4442 4427 4431 2242 1054 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
525% Outstanding
Read 2,966
Write 4,497
Mixed 2,739
SusWrite 3,506
777% 3,427 MB/s
4K Read 89.6
4K Write 232
4K Mixed 121
413% 147 MB/s
DQ Read 1,722
DQ Write 1,164
DQ Mixed 1,377
1,045% 1,421 MB/s
Poor: 271%
This bench: 525%
Great: 660%
Nvme Samsung SSD 990 PRO 2TB
986GB free
Firmware: 0B2QJXG7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2561 2509 2507 2504 2498 2523 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
443% Outstanding
Read 2,503
Write 2,457
Mixed 2,002
SusWrite 2,517
534% 2,370 MB/s
4K Read 85.5
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 125
400% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 1,716
DQ Write 1,181
DQ Mixed 1382
1,050% 1,427 MB/s
Poor: 271%
This bench: 443%
Great: 660%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DHX 6000 C36 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4200 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
144% Outstanding
MC Read 55.7
MC Write 57
MC Mixed 53.6
158% 55.4 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 48.8
SC Mixed 30.1
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 89.6
45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 128%
This bench: 144%
Great: 209%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 51 120 47.4" 1280 720 GSM9E83 LG ULTRAGEAR+
Typical ROG MAXIMUS Z790 FORMULA Builds (Compare 227 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 460%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 127%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 611%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z790 FORMULA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $2,415
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback