Fujitsu CELSIUS M730power

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	12.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	85.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M730power (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3128-A2
Memory	26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131014
Uptime	7 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '24 at 20:03
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345 10,301 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	72.6% Very good	Memory 84.5 1-Core 91.9 2-Core 189 70% 122 Pts	4-Core 328 8-Core 476 50% 402 Pts	64-Core 481 30% 481 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 474.64 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Lighting 14 Reflection 21.4 Parallax 18.9 11% 18.1 fps	MRender 21.8 Gravity 18.1 Splatting 15.5 15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 193 185 173 167 163 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	85.8% Excellent	Read 440 Write 427 Mixed 343 SusWrite 202 79% 353 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 64.5 4K Mixed 38.4 131% 44.9 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 294 DQ Mixed 338 253% 339 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 124%
Intenso SSD 512GB 514 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 391GB free Firmware: W0220A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 395 403 409 413 410 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	84.1% Excellent	Read 435 Write 380 Mixed 369 SusWrite 393 89% 394 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 66.3 4K Mixed 24.5 108% 39.5 MB/s	DQ Read 159 DQ Write 299 DQ Mixed 49.5 88% 169 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GR7AFR8C 4x8GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	MC Read 38.3 MC Write 40.9 MC Mixed 39.4 113% 39.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 13.3 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 71.6 56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	27"	1280 720	ACR0922 R272

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M730power Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M730power

CPU
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples	7x
Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples	6x
Xeon E5-2690 v2Intel $142Bench 71%, 1,083 samples	2x

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	5x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	3x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	2x

SSD
840 Pro 512GBSamsung $129Bench 96%, 14,996 samples	5x
SATAIII 1TBIntensoBench 76%, 294 samples	3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	2x

RAM
HMT31GR7EFR4C 4x8GBHynixBench 101%, 53 samples	4x
HMT42GR7AFR4C 8x16GBHynixBench 98%, 29 samples	2x
HMT31GR7EFR4C 8x8GBHynixBench 106%, 28 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $1,204

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16