Lenovo 82SA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82SA  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220406
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 23 '24 at 19:31
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 61.9
1-Core 173
2-Core 344
99% 193 Pts
4-Core 590
8-Core 921
93% 756 Pts
64-Core 1,339
83% 1,339 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 3AF6) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
13% Very poor
Lighting 19.1
Reflection 23.6
Parallax 22.7
16% 21.8 fps
MRender 19.2
Gravity 14.6
Splatting 0.2
8% 11.3 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNW010TZL 1TB
685GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C01C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 665 77 111 197 218 294 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,447
Write 1,252
Mixed 884
SusWrite 260
214% 961 MB/s
4K Read 56.4
4K Write 94
4K Mixed 69.6
224% 73.3 MB/s
DQ Read 517
DQ Write 456
DQ Mixed 571
405% 515 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 166%
Great: 403%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
54.9% Above average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 24.9
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 19.5
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 140
28% 140 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 16" 1280 720 LEN9153
Typical 82SA Builds (Compare 649 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82SA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback