Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory52.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230920
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateJan 23 '24 at 17:32
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Memory 77
1-Core 173
2-Core 340
103% 197 Pts
4-Core 652
8-Core 1,081
106% 866 Pts
64-Core 1,461
90% 1,461 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
124% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 116
Parallax 156
136% 146 fps
MRender 214
Gravity 131
Splatting 106
118% 150 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 124%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z44106
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,791
Write 1,186
Mixed 875
283% 1,284 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 65.4
4K Mixed 50.9
164% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 398
DQ Write 962
DQ Mixed 355
364% 572 MB/s
Poor: 103% Great: 236%
Samsung MZ7LH960HAJR-00005 960GB
713GB free
Firmware: HXT7404Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 464 473 484 475 477 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 484
Mixed 434
SusWrite 473
107% 474 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 44.8
150% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 367
DQ Mixed 376
282% 376 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 113%
Great: 126%
Samsung MZ7LH960HAJR-00005 960GB
772GB free
Firmware: HXT7404Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 468 475 485 477 482 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 472
Mixed 434
SusWrite 476
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 43.3
148% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 368
DQ Mixed 375
282% 376 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 112%
Great: 126%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
982GB free
Firmware: CC95
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 58 58 62 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 103
Write 25.4
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 59.4
44% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 61%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
468GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 61 62 61 62 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 61.4
Write 51.9
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 60.8
40% 54.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 59%
Toshiba MG04ACA400N 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: FJ2B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 194 197 196 197 195 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 196
Mixed 97.9
SusWrite 195
123% 168 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.9
257% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 109%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
393GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 80 82 81 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 73.2
Write 75.9
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 80.9
52% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391A2K43BB1-CTD 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77% Very good
MC Read 32
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 30.4
78% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 30.4
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 90.5
44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 77%
Great: 162%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 29 8 60 84.6" 2560 1369 SAM723F SAMSUNG
Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,667 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $652
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback