Asus STRIX B250H GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics87.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 months ago, 4 months ago.
MotherboardAsus STRIX B250H GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180511
Uptime7.8 Days
Run DateJan 23 '24 at 16:34
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$54
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 105
2-Core 207
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 351
47% 353 Pts
64-Core 373
23% 373 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
Asus(1043 868C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.8% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 148
Parallax 107
90% 122 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 104
Splatting 83
84% 106 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 501ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 34 37 38 37 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 57% Great: 87%
ST320LM0 10-1KJ15C 320GB
185GB free, PID 0420
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 40 41 40 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 50.7
Write 40.1
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 39.9
52% 39.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
48% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 38%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 1TB
691GB free, PID 0906
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 35 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 52
Write 37.3
Mixed 27.1
SusWrite 35.4
49% 38 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.4
106% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$63
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.3% Very good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 23.6
74% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 21.2
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 94.1
42% 94.1 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 49 75 28.8" 2560 1017 GSM59F1 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical STRIX B250H GAMING Builds (Compare 1,047 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus STRIX B250H GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $312
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback