HP Pavilion Desktop TP01-2xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive254% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Pavilion Desktop TP01-2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8906
Memory5.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230724
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJan 23 '24 at 03:26
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$165
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 74.9
1-Core 159
2-Core 331
98% 188 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 949
87% 727 Pts
64-Core 1,440
89% 1,440 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
HP(103C 8906) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Lighting 14.7
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 30.3
12% 20.2 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 27.8
Splatting 21.4
16% 19 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-1006 1TB
816GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1280 1334 1342 1361 1345 1352 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
254% Outstanding
Read 1,430
Write 1,342
Mixed 1,198
SusWrite 1,336
299% 1,327 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 56.9
200% 69.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,059
DQ Write 1,366
DQ Mixed 1,124
873% 1,183 MB/s
Poor: 161%
This bench: 254%
Great: 466%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4U2S8MF-16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.2% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 15.2
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.6
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 30 34.1" 1280 720 GSM7794 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical Pavilion Desktop TP01-2xxx Builds (Compare 803 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Pavilion Desktop TP01-2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $165
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback