MSI H310M GAMING ARCTIC (MS-7B28)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive50.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B28
MotherboardMSI H310M GAMING ARCTIC (MS-7B28)  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '24 at 00:24
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$160
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 91.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 241
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 621
70% 550 Pts
64-Core 588
36% 588 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 85F4) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 18.2
14% 17.8 fps
MRender 15.9
Gravity 18.5
Splatting 16.6
14% 17 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingmax 120GB 120GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 60 53 50 43 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 470
Write 124
Mixed 159
SusWrite 54.4
44% 202 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 14.6
81% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 57.4
DQ Mixed 19.7
36% 74.9 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 86%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$40
931GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 182 184 183 184 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 145
Write 182
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 184
96% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
142% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GD2.1527WC.002 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.5% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 10.6
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 12.2
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 23.8" 1280 720 LHCFFFF ATLAS VH238F
Typical H310M GAMING ARCTIC (MS-7B28) Builds (Compare 218 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI H310M GAMING ARCTIC (MS-7B28)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $270
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback