Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 139%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 174%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics163% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230615
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateJan 22 '24 at 22:43
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$515
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 82.1
1-Core 122
2-Core 247
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 990
88% 743 Pts
64-Core 2,651
164% 2,651 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$625
HP(103C 88D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 546.65
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
163% Outstanding
Lighting 215
Reflection 322
Parallax 231
175% 256 fps
MRender 312
Gravity 225
Splatting 168
184% 235 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 163%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,417
Write 2,265
Mixed 1,776
479% 2,153 MB/s
4K Read 62.5
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 86.9
289% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 891
DQ Write 675
DQ Mixed 740
565% 769 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Toshiba HDWJ110 1TB
563GB free
Firmware: AX1T1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 68 70 69 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 64.1
Write 64.9
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 68.8
41% 56.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 63%
Seagate ST1500LM003-9YH148 1.5TB
681GB free
Firmware: CC9G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 18 19 20 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 114
Write 26.5
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 18.7
35% 47.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
74% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3000C16-8GTZR 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 43.6
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 35.2
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 33.9
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 103%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 10 60 84.6" 1707 889 SAM71B5 SAMSUNG
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,822 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $937
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback