Intel X79F1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics41.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel X79F1  (all builds)
Memory18.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221018
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 22 '24 at 19:51
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 70.3
2-Core 144
59% 97.9 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 416
40% 333 Pts
64-Core 705
44% 705 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6500-XT-$140
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.5% Average
Lighting 49.9
Reflection 56.6
Parallax 90.2
41% 65.6 fps
MRender 85.7
Gravity 55.7
Splatting 28.7
43% 56.7 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NQ100 240GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11035
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 22 22 23 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 45% Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
169GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 98 100 100 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 175
Write 150
Mixed 108
SusWrite 98.9
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
231% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSZF1G72PZ- 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
42.2% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 14.2
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 8.7
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 165 24" 1280 720 GSM5C08 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical X79F1 Builds (Compare 205 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Intel X79F1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback